Re: unicable patch from vdrportal.de

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Eddi,

On 11.05.2010 22:32, Eddi De Pieri wrote:
Have you seen this patch?

Looks interesting. What’s your experience with Unicable? Is it viable?

I have read somewhere that there can be interference on DISEqC level between the units connected to a single cable. Have you observed mis-tuning? Can you manually force that with two units (i.e. change transponders on the units at the same time) at all?

Currently I have a standard 16-port switch, but I have to add another switch for more ports in the future. I planned to try Unicable for some of the new ports. Maybe 4×4 ports with pass-through to the current switch. Any advice you can give me?

by adjusting unicable.conf, it works for me... with inverto lnb scr

What did you have to adjust? I mean, more than the frequencies?

Regards and many thanks to "*fds2001
<http://www.vdrportal.de/board/profile.php?userid=25037&sid=a61beff62ad61c085ec7738602279443>*"

Did you use his last patch from 10/04/2010?

http://www.vdrportal.de/board/thread.php?postid=903896#post903896

– Matthias

_______________________________________________
vdr mailing list
vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Util Linux NG]     [Xfree86]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux