Re: SVDRP Port

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04.03.2010 12:44, Christian Tramnitz wrote:
> The current SVDRP Port 2001 is being used for several years now, but
> unfortunately it has never been registered with IANA.
> As such it does not show up in /etc/services and there is no name
> resolution for it, i.e. when starting a tcpdump.
> 
> While this is not a major issue I'd prefer to register an "official"
> port with IANA to avoid port conflicts in the future.
> I already checked with them, but port 2001 is already registered to
> another service, so doing this we would get a new port number. Since
> this is freely configurable in vdr (and most plugins/extensions that
> rely on it) I do not see an issue with that.
> 
> Any comments/ objections?

I like port 2001 - why stir this up and cause turmoil amoung all
those who have been using the default port for so long?

What are services "dc" and "wizard", anyway?

Klaus

_______________________________________________
vdr mailing list
vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Util Linux NG]     [Xfree86]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux