On Fri, 2010-02-05 at 08:47 +0000, Newsy Paper wrote: > Why not using rotor plugin? > > It's working ok even with 1.7.11, but there's a bug with my s2-3200. I > don't know if it's a HW or SW bug, but if I am on a High Band > transponder (22khz is active) the rotor doesn't move, so I have to > switch to a low band transponder first. Workround would be to disable > 22khz in the plugin automatically then rotate und reactive it again > (if it has been active before). But I don't know how to implement that This is why originally made the patch (thanks for rotor plugin author for lot's of useful code). I got fed up to unreliable operation and messing up of channels.conf with similar frequencies from other positions. As an example I don't need gotox command repeat any more. Even with gotox repeat I got large error probability. For a vdr plugin I could not find a way to merge the operations properly to other diseqc operations while ensuring compliance with diseqc spec. I'd separate rotor plugin to a generic channel scan plugin, that it is doing nicely. Retrieve (and store position) system of elder motors should be in the core vdr dvb-s support as well IMHO. The same timing hazard is potentially there too unless retrieve position is handwritten to diseqc.conf sequences. BR, Seppo > > regards > > Newspaperman > > --- Bikalexander <bikalexander@xxxxxxxxx> schrieb am Fr, 5.2.2010: > > > Von: Bikalexander <bikalexander@xxxxxxxxx> > > Betreff: Fwd: GOTOX patch for 1.7.5 > > An: vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx > > Datum: Freitag, 5. Februar 2010, 2:17 > > Thanks for the link, now I've finally > > got the correct version:). > > > > I am using 2 DVB cards, it can be adjusted in some way that > > certain > > device is being addressed? > > > > 2010/2/4 Ales Jurik <ajurik@xxxxxxxx>: > > > On Thursday 04 of February 2010, Bikalexander wrote: > > >> Even with last patch does not do it: > > >> > > > Which exactly version of patch did you use? What was > > the output of patching? > > > Was there any rejects? Did you try to patch vanilla > > version of vdr? Without > > > these basic information people could only guess what > > happened in your vdr. > > > > > > For me now it works without problem (latest patch is > > in > > > http://www.linuxtv.org/pipermail/vdr/2010-January/022017.html). > > > > > > Ales > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > vdr mailing list > > vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx > > http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails. > http://mail.yahoo.com > > _______________________________________________ > vdr mailing list > vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
