On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 3:27 AM, Halim Sahin <halim.sahin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > Just my opinion about the problem: > The fat filesystem has many limitations and I vote for dropping special > support for it in VDR because if someone wants to use a windows system, > he/she can use ntfs which works fine in current distributions (ntfs-3g). > Just my 2 Cents. > Halim Forcing people to change their servers by dropping _already existing_ support doesn't seem like the best way to handle it? There may be reasons they can't/don't use ntfs, though I'd rather not speculate what-if's. Another option could be to take a poll and if it's obvious dropping fat support isn't such a big deal, then bye bye fat. _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
