On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 4:21 AM, Udo Richter <udo_richter@xxxxxx> wrote: > However, this is not a concern for VDR or for this patch. Its ok for VDR > to look ahead, and not to carry endless compatibility hacks with it. I couldn't agree more. I cant stand when something is bloated down with that, just because some users out there refuse to update their system. I understand 'if its not broke, dont fix it', but that doesnt mean be an anchor weighing everything down. If you choose to stay in the dark ages, then suffer the consequences. ;) _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
