Re: livebuffer patch improvements suggestions.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 17:41 +0000, Scott wrote:

> I agree, if the buffer was a configurable FIFO file (location and
> size), then the user could choose if the location was on a hard disk
> or a RAM disk.  

I've never used the livebuffer patch - does it add any measurable
latency when zapping channels? 

The last thing I would want is to gradually morph VDR into a sloth like
MythTV :(

gdh



_______________________________________________
vdr mailing list
vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Util Linux NG]     [Xfree86]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux