Re: [FRC] Why are patches for framebuffer not needed anymore in release 0.1.0?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 12:21:18AM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:
> you released version 0.1.0 [1]. Could you please explain to me, why the
> framebuffer patches (intelfb, radeonfb) are not needed anymore?

since version 0.1.0 you will not need DRM from GIT anymore. You just can
use DRM as provided by the standard kernel shipped with debian 5.0
(lenny). This should ease the handling of the patch (see [2]).

In the course of that I concentrated the patches in

drm-radeon-intel.patch (version 0.0.11 and older)
fb-radeon-intel.patch

to one file

fb-drm-radeon-intel.patch (since version 0.1.0)

Cheers
   Thomas

[1] http://lowbyte.de/vga-sync-fields/vga-sync-fields/
[2] http://lowbyte.de/vga-sync-fields/vga-sync-fields/INSTALL

_______________________________________________
vdr mailing list
vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Util Linux NG]     [Xfree86]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux