> There must be an other problem that's causing this, but since this doesn't > happen here on my system, I'm afraid you'll need to do the debugging ;-) Which changes have been made between 1.7.2 and 1.7.3 in file writing mechanism? Not codechanges, because I dont understand them, but in words please. E.g. blocksize changed from xxx to yyy changed algo. changed cache or something else which can influence the performance. I found out, that in 172 the most time up to 20 stream data blocks are transmitted via NFS between one "NFS WRITE CALL / WRITE REPLAY" and "NFS COMMIT CALL / COMMIT REPLAY" combination and the next one. In 173/174 the number of stream data blocks decreases to an amount of 5 blocks maximal. Therefor the number of "NFS WRITE CALL / WRITE REPLAY" and "NFS COMMIT CALL / COMMIT REPLAY" combinations increases up to 4 to 5 times higher than in 172. This produces an enormous overhead, and this overhead could be reasonable for the two MegaByte/s networkoverload above the normal load with 1 MB/s per stream. Perhaps Klaus, you have an idea. -Günter -- This message was scanned by ESVA and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr