On 06.03.2009 15:37, Alex Betis wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Klaus Schmidinger > <Klaus.Schmidinger@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Klaus.Schmidinger@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > On 03.03.2009 22:23, Gregoire Favre wrote: > > Hello, > > > > just tried compiling vdr-1.7.4 against my v4l-dvb hg's source which > > fails if I don't use this : > > > > --- vdr.c~ 2009-01-18 12:02:37.000000000 +0100 > > +++ vdr.c 2009-03-03 22:17:49.000000000 +0100 > > @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ > > #include <pwd.h> > > #include <signal.h> > > #include <stdlib.h> > > +#include <linux/types.h> > > #include <sys/capability.h> > > #include <sys/prctl.h> > > #include <termios.h> > > vdr.c compiles just fine here with the most recent version of > v4l-dvb from > linuxtv.org <http://linuxtv.org> (6bd427caa0cb). > > I did report a problem with the driver's header files, though, in > > http://linuxtv.org/pipermail/linux-dvb/2009-March/031934.html > > However, there has been no repsonse to that, and the problem still > persists with the current version. > > Just curious: don't you have a problem compiling dvbdevice.c? > > I've faced the same problem after upgrading kernel to 2.6.27.19 > > Found the solution on the net: add the following to VDR Makefile: > DEFINES += -D__KERNEL_STRICT_NAMES Let's be careful to not mix up two different things here. There's apparently the problem Gregoire reported, which he solved by adding an #include, but which doesn't happen here (kernel 2.6.25.20). That one has nothing to do with the driver. @Gregoire: does this happen with plain vanilla VDR 1.7.4 or are there any patches involved? Can you compile dvbdevice.c with the latest driver header files? @Alex: are you referring to the problem Gregoire reported or to the one I reported? Klaus _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
