On 12.01.2009 16:01, Nicolas Huillard wrote: > Klaus Schmidinger a écrit : >> On 12.01.2009 13:41, Nicolas Huillard wrote: >>> YYYY-MM-DD-hh.mm.ch-ri.rec does not solve the problem of multiple VDR >>> instances recording the same show. >>> This is a usual problem of multiple instances sharing a single /video dir. >>> As we're talking about safety here, why not address it right now, once >>> and for all ? >> I did - by using the "resume id". This should be unique for any VDR instance >> accessing a common video directory. > > Well, I re-read the MANUAL regarding this issue before my posting above ;-) > The resume ID is described excactly as I use it : > "Defines an additional ID that can be used in a multi user > "environment, so that every user has his/her own resume > "files for each recording. The valid range is 0...99, with > "0 resulting in a file named 'resume.vdr', and any other > "value resulting in 'resume.n.vdr'. > > ie. it does not define the VDR instance, but the "user instance"... > In practice, I set this to the same 0 value on every VDR, because I want > to be able to stop a replay on one VDR, and continue viewing it on > another VDR, starting at the position I stopped it... Well, I thought that this id could also be used here, but apparently I was wrong. Ok, then let's have another id for this... Klaus _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
