Just to add 1 more opinion... Over 6 years i'm working with transport stream files and ALWAYS it was .ts because most of proprietary applications do not handle it correctly with any other extensions. There are DVD/VideoCD created by proprietary DVB Live TV recording that use transport stream files as well with .ts extension. Moreover, all players such as VLC/mplayer/xine well working with .ts transport stream files and do not require any renaming, while avidemux consider .ts a native extension for transport stream files as well. IMHO, it sould be .ts On Sun, 2009-01-04 at 14:50 +0100, Martin Dauskardt wrote: > > From: Klaus Schmidinger <Klaus.Schmidinger@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Up to now VDR has used names like 001.vdr for its recording files. > > While moving to Transport Stream as the recording format, I need to > > use a different file name extension, and so was wondering which one > > to use. My first idea was *.ts, for "Transport Stream", but when I > > point, for instance, Konqueror to such a file, it thinks it is a > > "Qt Translation Source". So I was wondering if I should use *.mpg > > instead. This one is identified by Konqueror as an MPEG file and > > will make it launch a proper player. > > > > What do you think about this? > I am strongly against this. > *.ts may conflict with KDE, but it is a usual ending for transport stream. > Several mpeg-tools can handle this. I think the dreambox is also using *.ts > for its recordings. > > *.mpg would give much more problems with applications. A TS is not an > mpeg-file. Applications which can play mpg but not TS may even crash. > > Greets, > Martin > _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
