You can use "make menuconfig" in /usr/src/multiproto and find the following information: Empia EM2800/2820/2840 USB video capture support (VIDEO_EM28XX) [N/m/?] Key the "N". Last,repeat "make". > From: vdr-request@xxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: vdr Digest, Vol 42, Issue 11 > To: vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx > Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 12:00:02 +0200 > > Send vdr mailing list submissions to > vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > vdr-request@xxxxxxxxxxx > > You can reach the person managing the list at > vdr-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of vdr digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: multiproto_plus is ancient (Lauri Tischler) > 2. Re: multiproto_plus is ancient (Lauri Tischler) > 3. Re: multiproto_plus is ancient (Artem Makhutov) > 4. Control VDR with RF remote (Michael Stepanov) > 5. Vdr-xine OSD question (Todd Luliak) > 6. Re: Control VDR with RF remote (Peer Oliver Schmidt) > 7. Re: Vdr-xine OSD question ( Antti Sepp?l? ) > 8. xine tvtime parameters explained (Lauri Tischler) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 13:14:56 +0300 > From: Lauri Tischler <lwgt@xxxxxx> > Subject: Re: multiproto_plus is ancient > To: VDR Mailing List <vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <487732A0.6060904@xxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > VDR User wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 4:13 AM, Lauri Tischler <lwgt@xxxxxx> wrote: > >> What 'FF mod card' are you referring to ? > > > > There's a hardware hack to allow the full transport stream to be > > passed by the Nexus. By default it doesn't so when there's heavy > > load, a lot of packets are dropped. > > > >> I have basic Hauppauge NEXUS-S FF card and a pair of Hauppauge NOVA-T > >> cards, in near future I will get some S2 capable card. > >> So, what tree should I use for VDR 1.7.xx ? > > > > For a stock Nexus-s, you can use any tree. V4L with the vdr api > > wrapper patch, or *multiproto*. > > Hmmm.. compile error.... > ---- > CC [M] /usr/src/multiproto/v4l/em28xx-audio.o > In file included from /usr/src/multiproto/v4l/em28xx-audio.c:39: > include/sound/core.h:281: error: 'SNDRV_CARDS' undeclared here (not in a > function) > /usr/src/multiproto/v4l/em28xx-audio.c:58: error: array index in > initializer not of integer type > /usr/src/multiproto/v4l/em28xx-audio.c:58: error: (near initialization > for 'index') > make[3]: *** [/usr/src/multiproto/v4l/em28xx-audio.o] Error 1 > make[2]: *** [_module_/usr/src/multiproto/v4l] Error 2 > make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.24-19-generic' > make[1]: *** [default] Error 2 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/multiproto/v4l' > ---- > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:13:05 +0300 > From: Lauri Tischler <lwgt@xxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [vdr] multiproto_plus is ancient > To: VDR Mailing List <vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <48775C61.3050908@xxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Lauri Tischler wrote: > > VDR User wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 4:13 AM, Lauri Tischler <lwgt@xxxxxx> wrote: > >>> What 'FF mod card' are you referring to ? > >> There's a hardware hack to allow the full transport stream to be > >> passed by the Nexus. By default it doesn't so when there's heavy > >> load, a lot of packets are dropped. > >> > >>> I have basic Hauppauge NEXUS-S FF card and a pair of Hauppauge NOVA-T > >>> cards, in near future I will get some S2 capable card. > >>> So, what tree should I use for VDR 1.7.xx ? > >> For a stock Nexus-s, you can use any tree. V4L with the vdr api > >> wrapper patch, or *multiproto*. > > > > Hmmm.. compile error.... > > ---- > > CC [M] /usr/src/multiproto/v4l/em28xx-audio.o > > In file included from /usr/src/multiproto/v4l/em28xx-audio.c:39: > > include/sound/core.h:281: error: 'SNDRV_CARDS' undeclared here (not in a > > function) > > /usr/src/multiproto/v4l/em28xx-audio.c:58: error: array index in > > initializer not of integer type > > /usr/src/multiproto/v4l/em28xx-audio.c:58: error: (near initialization > > for 'index') > > make[3]: *** [/usr/src/multiproto/v4l/em28xx-audio.o] Error 1 > > make[2]: *** [_module_/usr/src/multiproto/v4l] Error 2 > > make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.24-19-generic' > > make[1]: *** [default] Error 2 > > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/multiproto/v4l' > > ---- > > otoh the v4l-dvb tree compiles just fine but multiproto does not. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 15:30:25 +0200 > From: Artem Makhutov <artem@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [vdr] multiproto_plus is ancient > To: VDR Mailing List <vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <20080711133025.GA23628@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Hi, > > On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 01:14:56PM +0300, Lauri Tischler wrote: > > VDR User wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 4:13 AM, Lauri Tischler <lwgt@xxxxxx> wrote: > > >> What 'FF mod card' are you referring to ? > > > > > > There's a hardware hack to allow the full transport stream to be > > > passed by the Nexus. By default it doesn't so when there's heavy > > > load, a lot of packets are dropped. > > > > > >> I have basic Hauppauge NEXUS-S FF card and a pair of Hauppauge NOVA-T > > >> cards, in near future I will get some S2 capable card. > > >> So, what tree should I use for VDR 1.7.xx ? > > > > > > For a stock Nexus-s, you can use any tree. V4L with the vdr api > > > wrapper patch, or *multiproto*. > > > > Hmmm.. compile error.... > > ---- > > CC [M] /usr/src/multiproto/v4l/em28xx-audio.o > > In file included from /usr/src/multiproto/v4l/em28xx-audio.c:39: > > include/sound/core.h:281: error: 'SNDRV_CARDS' undeclared here (not in a > > function) > > /usr/src/multiproto/v4l/em28xx-audio.c:58: error: array index in > > initializer not of integer type > > /usr/src/multiproto/v4l/em28xx-audio.c:58: error: (near initialization > > for 'index') > > make[3]: *** [/usr/src/multiproto/v4l/em28xx-audio.o] Error 1 > > make[2]: *** [_module_/usr/src/multiproto/v4l] Error 2 > > make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.24-19-generic' > > make[1]: *** [default] Error 2 > > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/multiproto/v4l' > > ---- > > You need this patch: > > http://linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb/raw-diff/b0815101889d/v4l/compat.h > > Please take a look at > http://www.linuxtv.org/pipermail/linux-dvb/2008-February/023819.html > > > Maybe the patch should be directly merged into the multiproto tree... > > Regards, Artem > > -- > Artem Makhutov > Unterort Str. 36 > D-65760 Eschborn > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 17:35:36 +0300 > From: "Michael Stepanov" <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [vdr] Control VDR with RF remote > To: vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx > Message-ID: > <65922d730807110735o765771f4id685cdd7b6345a9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Hi, > > Does anybody use RF remote control with VDR instead of IR? How to configure > such remotes? > > Thanks in advance. > > -- > Cheers, > Michael > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: http://www.linuxtv.org/pipermail/vdr/attachments/20080711/0ecc1aee/attachment-0001.htm > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 10:10:14 -0700 (PDT) > From: Todd Luliak <javatodd32@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [vdr] Vdr-xine OSD question > To: vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx > Message-ID: <580290.30275.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > I am running vdr + vdr-xine plugin + coreavc + xine being output at > 1080i to an HDTV as the only display. Is there a simple way to lock the > OSD to the resolution of the output device such that the OSD is not > rescaled when switching between SD and HD sources? I played with > X-overlay, but that was not what I was after. If not, could it be done > in the source somewhere or is the OSD anti-aliased and overlayed on the > video before being sent to the output device (xine, in my case)? I've > looked around quite a bit on the net but I guess my google-foo is > failing me on this one. I just miss the rock-solid OSD of the FF card > setup... > > Thanks! > > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: http://www.linuxtv.org/pipermail/vdr/attachments/20080711/f6f5c05d/attachment-0001.htm > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 21:04:07 +0200 > From: Peer Oliver Schmidt <pos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [vdr] Control VDR with RF remote > To: VDR Mailing List <vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <4877AEA7.1070704@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Hello Michael, > > > Does anybody use RF remote control with VDR instead of IR? How to > > configure such remotes? > > I used the ATI RemoteWonder with it. LIRC has support for it. > > ps: But you should stay with lmce ;) > -- > Best regards > > Peer Oliver Schmidt > the internet company > PGP Key ID: 0x83E1C2EA > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 22:14:01 +0300 > From: " Antti Sepp?l? " <a.seppala+vdr@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [vdr] Vdr-xine OSD question > To: "VDR Mailing List" <vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: > <5e1d45280807111214x5254127cu3f1f5533e5c23aa4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > 2008/7/11 Todd Luliak <javatodd32@xxxxxxxxx>: > > I am running vdr + vdr-xine plugin + coreavc + xine being output at 1080i to > > an HDTV as the only display. Is there a simple way to lock the OSD to the > > resolution of the output device such that the OSD is not rescaled when > > switching between SD and HD sources? I played with X-overlay, but that was > > not what I was after. If not, could it be done in the source somewhere or is > > the OSD anti-aliased and overlayed on the video before being sent to the > > output device (xine, in my case)? I've looked around quite a bit on the net > > but I guess my google-foo is failing me on this one. I just miss the > > rock-solid OSD of the FF card setup... > > Thanks! > > > > In an effort to create something to solve such issues with > xineliboutput plugin I came up with an idea of this HUD type OSD. > Basically it means that OSD is rendered to a separate transparent > surface on top of video and then these are blended together by the > display hardware. This way the size of the OSD is bound to the size of > the used window rather than the size of the video stream. In other > words no OSD scaling will be necessary even though the video size > changes. > > The HUD implementation has been integrated into the CVS of > xineliboutput plugin. To operate it requires support for xorg render > extension and presence of composite display manager such as xcompmgr. > It also requires powerful display adapter and drivers with support for > these modern extensions. Maybe you can try it to see if it produces > results that you are hoping for? > > Regards, > > -- > Antti Sepp?l? > <a.seppala@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 11:23:49 +0300 > From: Lauri Tischler <lwgt@xxxxxx> > Subject: [vdr] xine tvtime parameters explained > To: VDR Mailing List <vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <48786A15.30804@xxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Trying to google for manual, info or article where all parameters for > xine tvtime command are explained, what they do, why, etc. > No luck yet, any pointers ?? > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > vdr mailing list > vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr > > > End of vdr Digest, Vol 42, Issue 11 > *********************************** MSN上小游戏,工作休闲两不误! 马上就开始玩! |
_______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr