On Sunday, 29. Juneta 2008 16:35:04 Goga777 wrote: > yes, it's better to use svn ffmpeg version, but anyway > > from this commit > http://svn.mplayerhq.hu/ffmpeg/trunk/libavcodec/h264.c?r1=13538&r2=13542 we > can see that in ffmpeg "PAFF + spatial direct mode is not implemented" > currently But hopefully in near (?) future it is?!? > [9784] [input_vdr] H.264: -> pts 8176924854 <- 0 (DTS 8176921254) > [9784] [input_vdr] H.264: -> pts 8176937454 <- 0 (DTS 8176923054) > [9784] [input_vdr] H.264: -> pts 8176935654 <- 0 > [9784] [input_vdr] H.264: -> pts 8176944654 <- 0 (DTS 8176941054) > [9784] [input_vdr] H.264: -> pts 8176946454 <- 0 (DTS 8176942854) > [9784] [input_vdr] H.264: -> pts 8176955454 <- 0 (DTS 8176951854) > [9784] [input_vdr] H.264: -> pts 8176957254 <- 0 (DTS 8176953654) > > > I don't know what's Neather I do.. ;-) > concerning of > > video_out: throwing away image with pts 1143799 because it's too old (diff > : 1019097). video_out: throwing away image with pts 1158199 because it's > too old (diff : 1027966). video_out: throwing away image with pts 1168999 > because it's too old (diff : 1035015). video_out: throwing away image with > pts 1172599 because it's too old (diff : 1049212). video_out: throwing away > image with pts 1186999 because it's too old (diff : 1053726). > > > be sure that your CPU is fast enough Maybe 2x "Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6400 @ 2.13GHz" is not enough.. I think that it happened because everything else (those problems PAFF and so) took so long time that it couldn't keep up the sync. -- JJussi _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
