Then surely it will not be an OSD pip any more but rather just a pip? seems like osd is the bottle neck? On 29/04/2008, Grégoire FAVRE <gregoire.favre@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Patrick Boettcher > <patrick.boettcher@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > With xine/softdevice, one should be able to do such things with very > few CPU usage, but that won't be > compatible to other output devices, kvdr for example was doing it > without any problem on my old P2@xxxxxx > > And that's a feature I would also enjoy to add into vdr-xine :-) > > > > I'm using it with vdr-xineliboutput from e-tobi. (not the 0.0.9 I think, > > but I'm not sure). > > > > Except that this version uses one complete processor when running. Good > > thing, I have a dual-core :). > > > -- > Grégoire FAVRE > http://picasaweb.google.com/Gregoire.Favre > http://gregoire.favre.googlepages.com/ > > > _______________________________________________ > vdr mailing list > vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr > _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
