On 04/09/08 02:11, Tuomas Jormola wrote: > On 9 Apr 2008, at 00:26, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: >> On 04/08/08 23:17, Tuomas Jormola wrote: >>> On 8 Apr 2008, at 23:49, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: >>>> Since this apparently happens also without VDR, I guess it will have >>>> to >>>> be fixed in the driver. >>> Well, the funny thing is that VDR 1.4.7 with exactly the same kernel >>> and hardware does not give any symptoms at all. On startup CAM is >>> initialized quickly just fine. >> VDR 1.4 didn't permanently monitor the module status. > Well, as an end user I don't really care what the two versions do > differently behind the scenes. Net effect for me is that with VDR 1.4 > my CAM is working and with VDR 1.6 it's unusable. So to me VDR 1.6 is > broken, what ever the technical reason might be. The problem is that this malfunction happens on *your* system, not on *mine*. So I'm afraid I can't be of too much help in debugging this. Klaus _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
