Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: > > For me personally playbackability with VDR was never a priority. > > I've been using VDR for recording since Oktober 2000, back then i had to > write my own cutting scripts, since VDR didn't had the cutting function > until later. A few month later i began writing my Master-Timer. VDR has > been the "recording slave" ever since. ;-) > > Since 2003 i use vdrsync/tcmplex for the actual cutting (As it > demultiplexes and remultiplexes the recording, i.e. it verifies that the > recording is good(tm)) to single .mpg-files which i than watch & > archive. > > Mostly i playback at my computer, especially since i bought a 1920x1200 > 24" TFT a few month back, but for TV playback i also have a "Pinnacle > Showcenter 200". I only use VDR playback to cut music-videos (or to find > the beginning of a song i want to cut out, to be more precise), that's > the only playback related feature where VDR excels anything else i have > tried. > > Over the years i've recorded more than 13.000 broadcasts, stored on 55 > HDDs with a total capacity of 20 TB. ;-) > For me playbackability with VDR is really needed. I like dvbcut more than vdrsync because with the linear/logarithmic sliders you can really easy find start and end of ads or similar. 20TB. That would be more than 5000 single layer DVDs. What a mess. HDs are much easier to handle. But i really dont want to have 13000 recordings! Have fun. Flo _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
