Klaus Schmidinger <Klaus.Schmidinger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 03/08/08 19:12, Clemens Kirchgatterer wrote: > > Klaus Schmidinger <Klaus.Schmidinger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> I still believe, though, that freetype2's include files are broken. > >> A simple '#include <freetype2.h>' should be enough. If their header > >> file(s) would behave like the rest, we wouldn't have this > >> discussion. > > > > no. pkg-config and freetype-config have absolutly nothing to do with > > that. i think nearly every "obtional" library has one of these to > > provide a way to find them at compile and link time. please see the > > output of: ls /usr/bin/*-config > > But would it kill anybody to simply have all header files at > a standard place (/usr/include and /usr/local/include)? yes it would. how would you install different versions of the same libraries (with their headers) if it wasn't in different paths? and what about cross compilers? the possibillity of having libs and headers in different places is a very important feature, not an anoying bug. > Why should every application go on a scavenger hunt to find > all the header files it needs? see above. anyway, thats the way it was since many many years for good reasons. it's the standard way of finding compiler and linker flags for libraries and you like obeying standards, don't you? SCNR... clemens _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
