Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@xxxxxx> wrote: > FWIW, I think providing a pkgconfig file is very much a "root" > solution (ditto $foo-config scripts, but *.pc are much simpler to > write and read and have a unified interface). Lots of library > packages (and also some others) provide them nowadays which is great, > and has made the things you express dissatisfaction with in the above > as well as other similar ones pretty much moot. i can't agree more. > In fact, I think VDR should also provide a *.pc file. I ship one in > Fedora's VDR packages, and a good deal of it would be applicable to > upstream VDR too. Just let me know if you're interested and I'll have > a look at making a upstreamable version of it. i would even say VDR is broken in the way it handles plaugins. VDR's Makefile should install all exported vdr headers in $(PREFIX)/include/vdr and provide a vdr.pc file (as you suggest). then plugins could be buildable outside of VDR's source directory and install themself in $(PREFIX)/lib/vdr. as any other plugin capable program out there i know. just my 2 cents ... clemens _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
