On 03/06/08 11:36, Ales Jurik wrote: > On Thursday 06 of March 2008, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: >> Sorry, I don't speak Czech, so I can't follow what's going on there. >> > > Hi, > > there is nothing more than I've tried to put into this maillist except > discussion. > >> With the recent change at least the Czech channels should work >> properly again. Can you confirm that? >> > > Yes, I confirm that. Similar solution was proposed by bastlir at the forum (he > proposed to comment out the line your patch is deleting). > >> For version 1.6.0 there's nothing more I can do than using the environment >> variable. Maybe later I'll introduce a "workaround-provider-stupidity.conf" >> ;-) >> > > I agree with you but I'm afraid that such communications with broadcasters > will give no results. This maybe will be successfull when big producers of > sat boxes will make such pression too. But it seems that for them is more > efficient to make localization which is compliant to broadcasters not to sat > norms. I'd really like to know why some broadcasters don't adhere to the standards (even though it would be a child's game). Are they actively refusing to, unable to interpret the standard documents, or just flat out dumb? Klaus _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
