Re: [patch] channels with same pids

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Trying working with NA sats. At least in Europe you have standards. Here the
only standard is that there is no standard.
For example, on 97w after using a custome scanner, if I allow VDR to auto
update channel names, then surf through the channels with a fresh conf, some
channels dissapear, others get renamed to wrong names, etc.. Using yaepg
while fliping through I can see some channels get shuffled and renamed.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Klaus Schmidinger" <Klaus.Schmidinger@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2008 7:00 AM
Subject: Re:  [patch] channels with same pids


> On 02/24/08 12:35, Igor wrote:
> >> Have you ever tried complaining to those providers, telling them about
> >> their non-standard behavior?
> >
> > I have tried. Several times. No results.
>
> I wonder why these people think that the DVB standards don't apply to
them...
>
> > I can confirm that only VDR has this problem. Other receivers (dreambox
for example) don't have this problem.
>
> Does this mean that the dreambox doesn't identify channels using
NID/TID/SID?
>
> VDR itself doesn't use the RID, and I don't like starting to use it
> just to iron out the inability of some providers to adhere to the
standard.
> I'd rather like to get rid of the RID altogether.
>
> Klaus
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> vdr mailing list
> vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


_______________________________________________
vdr mailing list
vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Util Linux NG]     [Xfree86]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux