Hi, Morfsta schrieb: >> Well, the spec tells you that aspect_ratio_idc 11 means a sample >> (pixel) aspect ratio 15:11 (1.3636). And you have 1440 x 1080 >> pixels so the frame aspect ratio yields: >> >> far = 1.3636 * 1440 / 1080 = 1.8181 > > Could you give me a link to where you found that please? I've posted the URL to the spec some weeks ago already. In that issue, have a look into Annex E.2.1, Table E-1, Page 313. > Also, I just discovered another problem with this method. I was > wondering why the performance on HD was so poor and it turns out that > the picture was being de-interlaced twice, once by CoreAVC for the > h264 picture and then by xine post plugin (tvtime). When I remove the > post deinterlacing plugin the performance is much better and now seems > to decode all the h264 channels I have access to pretty well with ~40% > idle. However, when I go back to a MPEG2 channel of course the > deinterlacing is now disabled and it looks terrible! > > Do you know if its possible to enable de-interlacing for only a > certain picture type(s), or am I looking at this the wrong way? Simply set the progressive_frame flag. But use_progressive_frame_flag=0 overrides this information and will still deinterlace. To disable it completely for your decoder even in this case, do not set VO_INTERLACED_FLAG when getting the frame. Have a look into ff_video_decoder.c. Bye. -- Dipl.-Inform. (FH) Reinhard Nissl mailto:rnissl@xxxxxx _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
