On 02/03/08 13:36, Ales Jurik wrote: > On Sunday 03 February 2008, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: >> So, here's the straw poll: >> >> Should there be a stable version 1.6.0 now, based on what's in >> version 1.5.14, but without DVB-S2 or even H.264 support? >> >> Yes or No? >> >> Klaus >> > > Hi Klaus, > I vote for DVB-S2/H.264 (HDTV) support. But if it is a problem with some > distros could it be there time-compile switch to choose which drivers to use? The developer version will only support one driver API officially, and that's the "multiproto" API. > I thing it would be disadvantage to leave at whole such a well prepared part > of vdr. It wouldn't be left out of the developer version (which would then be numbered 1.7.x). The question was whether there is enough demand for a stable version *now*, based on what is in version 1.5.14, but without the switch to DVB-S2 (and thus the "multiproto" driver). So far there have been 19 votes here on the list, 11 No and 8 Yes. I have asked the same question over on vdrportal.de, and there the situation looks a lot different: 90 votes, 70 Yes, 20 No. For the final result all votes given here on the ML and on vdrportal.de will be added up. Klaus _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
