On 02/03/08 13:39, Patrick Boettcher wrote: > On Sun, 3 Feb 2008, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: > >> On 02/03/08 13:26, Patrick Boettcher wrote: >>> Hi Klaus, >>> >>> On Sun, 3 Feb 2008, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: >>>> Should there be a stable version 1.6.0 now, based on what's in >>>> version 1.5.14, but without DVB-S2 or even H.264 support? >>> With H264 support, because some DVB-T channels (at least here in France) >>> are starting to carry H264-channels, afaiu unencrypted. >>> >>> With Multiproto support (DVB-S2), but only if VDR is able to switch to the >>> current DVB-API provided by standard kernels at compile time. I guess >>> Multiproto will not be there before 2.6.26 or even later. There is a bunch >>> of drivers currently not working with Multiproto. >> There can only be "Yes" or "No" answers ;-) > > There can be only yes or no to a "yes-or-no question". The latter criteria > does not apply for yours. > > Maybe shorter: yes, without DVB-S2 support, with H264. Well, basically the question was "Should there be a stable version 1.6.0 now, based on what's in version 1.5.14, but without DVB-S2". Maybe I shouldn't have added the "or even H.264 support" part. That said, I count your vote as a "No". Klaus _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
