On 03.02.2008 12:17, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: > On 02/03/08 12:06, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: > > On 03.02.2008 11:17, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: > >> So, here's the straw poll: > >> > >> Should there be a stable version 1.6.0 now, based on what's in > >> version 1.5.14, but without DVB-S2 or even H.264 support? > > > > Is the CAM Handling regarding multiple parallel recodings (on the same > > channel) fixed? > > Have you tried version 1.5 yet? No And as the 1.2-version works great i have no real pressure for anything newer. (*) The only exception is channel-scanning, but for that i have a 1.4-version in a parallel-setup, that i can run for a bit of time when there are no recordings pending. I will try a 1.6-version after a little time has passed, but it heavily depends on me having to update the Linux-install to a recent state or not. > It can do multiple parallel recordings with the same CAM (if the > CAM supports this). That's not a case i'm very much interested in, at least as long as i don't know it is actually usable in my case. But even then, Murphy will prevent it from being useful 90% of the time it could have been useful. So it's still nothing i would count on. *: Taking aside that i can't update my DVB-computers linux-installation to anything recent as the 1.2-version of VDR can't cope with a recent glibc (threading). But that's not a real problem as i don't use my DVB-computers for anything else. :-) Bis denn -- Real Programmers consider "what you see is what you get" to be just as bad a concept in Text Editors as it is in women. No, the Real Programmer wants a "you asked for it, you got it" text editor -- complicated, cryptic, powerful, unforgiving, dangerous. _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
