On 02/03/08 12:27, Ville-Pekka Vainio wrote: > Klaus Schmidinger wrote: >> On 02/03/08 11:43, Rolf Ahrenberg wrote: >>> No. The current features in 1.5.14 are still missing some essential key >>> features that should be included in the next stable version: DVB >>> subtitling (still missing component type support for the hard of >>> hearing), EBU subtitling, native channels.conf support for pseudo DVB >>> devices (pvrinput, iptv, analogtv), and multiple channel lists. >> I am not going to deal with these things before DVB-S2/H.264, anyway. >> >> Klaus > > I've been using VDR for about a year and a half now and it's great. But with > all due respect, I think you're doing this the wrong way around. At least > here in Finland, decent DVB subtitles support is pretty much the only thing > VDR needs to be usable out-of-the-box with the free channels we have. > > In my opinion DVB-S2/H.264 are "nice to have" extra features, but working DVB > subtitling support is a "must have" feature for PVR software like VDR, > because almost everyone needs DVB subtitles around here, but not that many > watch HDTV channels yet. Which version of VDR are you using? The current developer version does have DVB subtitling support. Klaus _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
