> El Mi?rcoles, 14 de Febrero de 2007, Simon Baxter escribi?:
>> >> In order to get the correct info from a v4l2-ctl --all:
>> >> Format:
>> >> Type : VBI Capture
>> >> Sampling Rate : 27000000 Hz
>> >> Offset : 248 samples (9.18519e-06 secs after leading
>> >> edge)
>> >> Samples per Line: 1440
>> >> Sample Format : GREY
>> >> Start 1st Field : 6
>> >> Count 1st Field : 18
>> >> Start 2nd Field : 318
>> >> Count 2nd Field : 18
>> >> Video input : 0 (Tuner 1)
>> >> Audio input : 0 (Tuner 1)
>> >> Frequency: 1440000 (90.000000 MHz)
>> >> Video standard = 0x000000ff
>> >> PAL-B/B1/G/H/I/D/D1/K
>> >> Tuner:
>> >> Capabilities : @@ -881,12 +881,19 @@
>> >> bool cPvrDevice::Tune(int freq)
>> >> {
>> >> struct v4l2_frequency vf;
>> >> + int freqaux = freq;
>> >>
>> >> memset(&vf, 0, sizeof(vf));
>> >> vf.tuner = 0;
>> >> - vf.type = V4L2_TUNER_ANALOG_TV;
>> >> + if (freq < 88000000)
>> >
>> > I think this don't work. I use freq >180000 because 180000 is the
>> max
>> > range
>> > for FM.
>> > You can also use:
>> >
>> > if (radio_fd >= 0)
>> > radio
>> > else
>> > tv
>> >
>> > Jose Alberto
>>
>> I've found some weird stuff. When vf.tuner is set to V4L2_TUNER_RADIO
>> the
>> freq seems to be a factor smaller. In experimenting, I find if I set
>> the
>> channels between 88000000 & 108000000 (for 88-108Mhz - looks like this
>> is
>> set as Hz ???) monitoring what's been set on the PVR-150 with 'v4l2-ctl
>> --all', I see these values set the correct freq and I get a 50% or
>> better
>> signal strength. What's more, the 'v4l2-ctl --all' matches what's set
>> with a 'ivtv-radio -f90.0'.
>>
>> Problem is, no audio is output!! It looks like the v4l2 tuner is set to
>> radio, the tuner is set to 90.9Mhz, but it's trying to play the stream
>> from /dev/video0 rather than /dev/video24. Does this make sense??
> radio:
> /dev/video24->raw audio
> /dev/video0->compressed mp2 audio
Turns out it is working perfectly - but I wasn't able to confirm this
remotely. When I got home and 'attached' my vdr-xine client, the radio
started coming though!
Thanks Jose....
