Udo Richter wrote: > martin wrote: >> just to let you know: the patch you attached here, did not solve the >> problem! My VDR crashed again. > > Just a few minutes too late... > > The patch had another bug that re-introduced the original problem once > again. The new copy constructor did not initialize the aux pointer, and > the assign operator consequently free'd its uninitialized value - and > with some luck, thats a valid pointer. > > The attached patch does the missing initialization. Hopefully, thats the > last bug. ;) That'll teach me not to write code when I'm on my way out to the "Biergarten"... ;-) Thanks. Klaus
