Udo Richter wrote: > Klaus Schmidinger wrote: >>> It's probably best to implement an actual copy-constructor. >>> >>> Please try the attached patch, which contains both changes. >> >> Attached is the correct version. > > Thats the better fix of course, and may fix this in case some plugin did > the same mistake. (couldn't find one in one of my plugins though) > > Of course this touches the header and requires to bump APIVERSION. And > it probably requires compiling all plugins. Well, I wonder if we'll ever see a bugfix release that doesn't need to bump APIVERSION ;-) If only I had never agreed to introduce this beast... Klaus
