Peter Weber wrote: >>-------- Original-Nachricht -------- >>Datum: Wed, 31 May 2006 21:10:47 +0300 >>Von: Anssi Hannula <anssi.hannula@xxxxxxxxx> >>An: VDR Mailing List <vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>Betreff: Re: xine-network patches >> >>Magnus H?rlin wrote: >> >>>Anssi Hannula wrote: >>>> >>>>Those who run vdr-xine with the network patches, what is the version of >>>>your libxine and which patches do you use for libxine and vdr-xine? >>>> >>>>I tried with the patches from x-vdr, vdr-xine-0.7.9, vdr-1.4.0-2 and >>>>http://home.vrweb.de/~rnissl/xine-lib-cvs-20060319194500.tar.bz2, but >>>>I'm unable to get a good video. I estimate the framerate to be about >>>>0,2fps... Both systems have over 70% idle. >>>> >>> >>>I'm running vdr-1.4.0, vdr-xine-0.7.9 with network patch from x-vdr and >>>a xine-lib and xine-ui from the xine cvs the day 1.4.0 was released. I >>>have however not had any problems with any combination of xine and vdr. >>>Do you have the same problem when running the ui on the same machine as >>>vdr? >>> >> >>No, I don't, and that's really strange. When running on the same system >>I get no picture at all and lots of errors like this: >>=== CLEAR(-4.2) >>=== CLEAR(-4.3) >>=== CLEAR(-4.4) >>=== CLEAR(-4.5) >>--- CLEAR(-4b) >>bad_frame >>bad_frame >>bad_frame >>bad_frame >>bad_frame >> >>I guess I'll to try to change the xine-lib version to the one you use. > > i use this settings in setup.conf > > xine.modeLiveTV.monitoringDuration = 0 > xine.modeLiveTV.prebufferFrames = 4 > xine.modeLiveTV.prebufferHysteresis = 4 > > after this changes, all went ok on my client Thanks for the suggestions, people. Unfortunately neither improved the situation. Running xine-ui in remote x86_64 host produces slow motion => transfer buffer overflows continuosly, and running on local i586 host produces lots of errors but no picture. The problem isn't in the network bandwidth, because I can use mplayer+streamdev to watch many channels simultaneously. CPU power is also not a problem, as there is a lot of idle time in both systems. Also note that I had this working when the network-xine patch was first introduced. It feels like the code sleeps somewhere too long or something like it. What do you think, how should I proceed in debugging this? -- Anssi Hannula
