Joerg Riechardt wrote: > * I record a film > * I set 2 marks (time a and time b) and cut > * in the cutted film there are 2 marks as well (time c and time d) > * I compare the length of the piece between the 2 marks in the original > with the cutted film: d-c is shorter than b-a, the differenc is b-(last > i-frame before b) > * if the cutted film is very short, like 10 seconds, you see that after > d there is a little more film, but not enough that you could shift mark > d further to the end > > this is with the last vdr versions and vdr-xine. > do others have the same effect? is this known? is there a fix? This is normal. Editing marks can only be set at I-frame positions. With marks at I-frames 'a' and 'b', everything from 'a' to the frame *before* 'b' (which is either a P- or a B-frame) will go into the edited version. At the time this was implemented in cCuttingThread::Action() it seemed like the simplest solution to stop right before the last mark, and for a normal (i.e. reasonably long) recording this shouldn't make much of a difference. But I agree that with shorter recordings this might be irritating. I currently see no reason why the last I-frame couldn't be part of the edited version. However, there is esyslog("ERROR: 'I' frame at end of file #%d", *FileNumber); in cIndexFile::GetNextIFrame(), so any change in that area would require more thought. So this will have to wait until after version 1.4. Klaus