[patch] Load plugins based on VDRVERSION and APIVERSION alternatively

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Oliver Endriss wrote:
> Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> 
>>Udo Richter wrote:
>>
>>>Udo Richter wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>We'll see how much chaos will arise when VDRVERSION and APIVERSION 
>>>>differ the first time. Hopefully, most plugins will soon be updated.
>>>
>>>
>>>The attached patch issues a warning on all plugins that seem to use the 
>>>old libvdr-$(PLUGIN).so.$(VDRVERSION) naming scheme. This gives a hint 
>>>about plugins that did compile, but will not be installed or loaded.
>>
>>Ok, but I'll go even one step further and not compile them at all.
> 
> 
> Very bad idea!
> You cannot assume that 100+ plugins will be converted immediately.

They won't be loaded, anyway. So what's the point in
compiling them?

Klaus


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Util Linux NG]     [Xfree86]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux