syrius.ml@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Hi, > > Could anybody recall me why that change occured ? > I don't find it on the mailing list archive: > > @@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ > pri = 6; // receiving with same priority but fewer Ca's > else > pri = 7; // all others > - if (pri < select) { > + if (pri <= select) { > select = pri; > d = device[i]; > if (NeedsDetachReceivers) 2006-01-08: Version 1.3.38 - Adapted c(Dvb)Device::ProvidesCa() to the dynamic CA handling. This was necessary because otherwise it didn't select the optimal device in case there are several CAMs. Klaus