Holger Brunn wrote: >>There is already a file named sources.conf in VDR. >>Do you think it is a good idea to use the same name for >>something (presumably) different? > > > This file resides in $PLUGINDIR/filebrowser/sources.conf so it shouldn't > collide with the one in $VDRCONFDIR. > The name "sources.conf" was infered from *sources.conf files in $PLUGINDIR > that serve a similar purpose, the prefix was removed for I use an own > directory for the config files. > Should it be a bad idea to name the files in a plugin's dedicated config > directory the most convenient way? Well, basically you can name your files whatever you like. I just thought that if, in a discussion, somebody speaks about the "sources.conf" file, it might be unclear which file is actually meant. Personally I have no problem with that, because I only use plain vanilla VDR ;-). Klaus
