On Tuesday 13 September 2005 19:01, Carsten Koch wrote: > I wonder if it would be an improvement of that strategy > if VDR only took the summary from the timer entry if it > is not much shorter than the summary from the related EPG data. The length of the description is not always a good criterion for being up-to-date. Some providers send a standard description and replace it a few days before the event with something thats up-to-date but perhaps shorter. On Tuesday 13 September 2005 18:10, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: > delimiting character that separates 'description' from 'comment', as in > > ...:Description of what happens#some arbitrary comment > > where '#' would be that new delimiter. Everything before the delimiter > would go into the 'description', and everything after it would simply > be stored and otherwise ignored by VDR. The delimiter could be a problem, but what about a sequence like CR#CR? Can't imagine, that this is part of a description. Another question: Would this comment be absolutely invisible in VDR (in timers and recordings summary)? If so, will there be a method like cTimer::Comment(), so that plugins could also use it? Would be great! ;-) Christian
