s?ndag 24. juli 2005, 20:22, skrev Johannes Stezenbach: > Kenneth Aafl?y wrote: > > l?rdag 23. juli 2005, 21:41, skrev matthieu castet: > > > That should be vdr that was(is)n't POSIX thread compliant... > > > > Hu? VDR was made with pthreads in mind, who cares about standards? > > I'm not sure what to make out of this statement. (What does > the "p" in pthread mean?) Well, pthreads, as in LinuxThreads :) > > > If you are interested there are a projet for tracing NPTL [1] and you > > > could find what broke vdr. > > > > Thanks for sharing! > > You'll be thrilled to know that there even is a > "NPTL Stabilization Project": > http://www.linuxsymposium.org/2005/view_abstract.php?content_key=45 > http://nptl.bullopensource.org/ I'm still unable to figure out what changes the NPTL will force on the LinuxThreads implementation. Kenneth
