You're right thats what I'm talking about. Mws schrieb: >hi, > >are you talking 'bout premiere subchannels on "direkt" and "sportportal"? > >regards >mws > > >On Monday 13 June 2005 20:23, Tomahawk wrote: > > >>Just tried to insulate the available data using dvbsnoop >> >>As far as I can see the needed data is not in SDT but because you get >>the Program number it seems you would have to scan all PATs (perhaps by >>caching them everytime you are tuned to their transponder) for the right >>program number. >>But at least you would know it is not on the current transponder because >>its not in the actual PAT. >> >>Program Association Table (PAT) for 378 MHz in my case holds the correct >>information for the channel >> Program_number: 221 (0x00dd) >> reserved: 7 (0x07) >> Program_map_PID: 97 (0x0061) >> >>I will dig into the tuxbox code where this works without problems to >>determine their way of working on this. >> >>Greetz >> >>Tom >> >> >>Klaus Schmidinger schrieb: >> >> >> >>>Tomahawk wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>... >>>>Getting back to the core problem, why is it that VDR detects the channel >>>>(even gives it the right name), but takes the Frequency of the base >>>>channel for this one instead of the correct frequency ? >>>>E.g. he takes the the 362 MHz of th base channel instead of 378 MHz >>>>where the channel physically resides. >>>> >>>> >>>I guess that's because in the SDT filer (where new channels are detected) >>>the only known frequency is that of the channel that is currently >>>delivering >>>the data. But maybe there is still something missing in VDR's way of >>>handling >>>this, so please feel free to debug into this and let me know if you >>>find something. >>> >>>Klaus >>> >>>
