On Monday 09 May 2005 12:37, Jere Malila wrote: > May 9 06:41:50 vdr vdr[3062]: buffer usage: 70% (tid=98311) > May 9 06:41:51 vdr vdr[3062]: buffer usage: 80% (tid=98311) > May 9 06:41:52 vdr vdr[3062]: buffer usage: 90% (tid=98311) > May 9 06:41:53 vdr vdr[3062]: buffer usage: 100% (tid=98311) > May 9 06:41:53 vdr vdr[3062]: ERROR: 1 ring buffer overflow (177 bytes > dropped) > May 9 06:41:59 vdr vdr[3062]: ERROR: 6294 ring buffer overflows > (1183272 bytes dropped) > May 9 06:42:05 vdr vdr[3062]: ERROR: 7059 ring buffer overflows > (1327092 bytes dropped) I get this nonsense too. However I've noticed that this does not in any way stop vdr from performing recordings on time etc. It only appears to affect the display device. I bound a key on my remote that does "killall -KILL vdr" so no need to start sshing or pulling power cables when it happens :) It used to happen more often for me when I had a 1GHz celeron doing the job, once every day or so. Now with the 1.8GHz duron it's more like once a week. Sounds like a race somewhere, no?
