Patrick Boettcher <patrick.boettcher@xxxxxxx> writes: >> I should admit, i'm using it all the time ! it's far more stable than >> having 2 vdr processes + the old streamdev >> ( yep 2 vdr = 2 times more crashed ;-) ) > So all of you say, that the networked-vdr-xine is running stable, with > no (new) issues? Can't believe it :). we've already noticed an issue with live-pausing :) and it seems vdr+networked-xine doesn't like when the xine ui is not correctly closed. (it freezes vdr, kill -9 is the only solution) I'll do more tests this WE (with less plugins) > The idea of course is to integrate it into vdr-xine. Therefore the > fifos would be removed (even for local use) and substituted by > sockets. But neither me nor anyone else has had the time to do a clean > integration into vdr-xine and xinelib. Reinhard says, that this part > needs a cleanup anyway... So combining both steps is just logical. ok --
