On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 10:05:15PM +0100, Matthias L?tzke wrote: > Just the same DiSEqC-support as in BETA2 but with a cleaner code. OK, I should have said it better : what's the DiSEqC-support in BETA2 ? > Thanks for Your feedback. I'll do any test you would like with pleasure :-) I am very happy to not have to "build" another connection to the dishes... -- Gr?goire Favre ___________________________________________________________________ http://magma.epfl.ch/Gregoire.Favre mailto:Gregoire.Favre@xxxxxxxxx
