On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 20:12 +0000, Darren Salt wrote: > I demand that Thomas Wehrspann may or may not have written... > > > finally, I can announce the official launch of the english VDR wiki: > > http://www.linuxtv.org/vdrwiki/index.php/Main_Page the english counterpart > > of the german VDR wiki at http://www.vdr-wiki.de. > > Long overdue, if you ask me :-) > > But there's one problem with the licence: are there any non-free > pollut^H^H^H^H^H^Hcomponents, such as cover texts, which we should know > about? The Wiki is certainly welcome, but I think FDL is not a good idea; it's incompatible with the GPL. Think including docs from the Wiki in VDR, or vice versa. (Maybe Darren meant that)? It's probably too late to do anything about it though. http://home.twcny.rr.com/nerode/neroden/fdl.html http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp/Tools/Attitude/fdl-harmful.html http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/Position_Statement.html
