On 2/27/25 01:25, Karel Zak wrote: > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 08:49:14PM GMT, Joe Jin wrote: >> +#define irqtop_batch_mode(ctl) ((ctl)->batch == true) > Do we need this macro? I think use > > if (ctl->batch) > ... > or > > if (!ctl->batch) > ... > > in the code is good enough. I'll remove the macro. > >> +#define irqtop_printf(ctl, fmt, args...) \ >> + do { \ >> + if (irqtop_batch_mode(ctl)) \ >> + fprintf(stdout, fmt, ##args); \ >> + else { \ >> + wprintw(ctl->win, fmt, ##args); \ >> + } \ >> + }while(0) > It would be more robust to use an inline function with vw_printw() and > vfprintf() rather than a macro with a variadic number of arguments, or > use __VA_ARGS__ in the macro. Thanks for your suggestions, I'll create an inline function. Thanks, Joe > > Karel >