Hi, On Sat Jan 7, 2023 at 8:47 PM CET, wrote: > From: Alison Chaiken <alison@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Omit "0x" from a mask example which is clearly hexadecimal rather than omitting > it from "32", which could be a decimal representation. > --- > schedutils/taskset.1.adoc | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/schedutils/taskset.1.adoc b/schedutils/taskset.1.adoc > index c10cc62a2..efbab08dc 100644 > --- a/schedutils/taskset.1.adoc > +++ b/schedutils/taskset.1.adoc > @@ -52,10 +52,10 @@ is processor #0, > *0x00000003*:: > is processors #0 and #1, > > -*0xFFFFFFFF*:: > +*FFFFFFFF*:: > is processors #0 through #31, > > -*32*:: > +*0x32*:: > is processors #1, #4, and #5, > > *--cpu-list 0-2,6*:: > -- > 2.32.0 I'd keep the `0x` prefix simply for consistency reasons. It's easy for the eye to recognize the character sequence as a number and looks cleaner in general. The second change, however, I think is right for the very same reason. -- Best Regards, Tom Schwindl
