On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 09:20:48AM +0200, Karel Zak wrote: > On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 07:31:07PM +0300, Péter Ujfalusi wrote: > > On 06/09/2022 11:47, Karel Zak wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 10:04:36AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > > >> lib/timeutils.c | 8 ++++++++ > > >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > > > > > Applied, thanks. > > > > After some tinkering with a script where I needed this, would it make > > sense to change the way how one should be specifying seconds since the > > Epoch time to > > '@'<number> > > Yes, '@' seems more readable. I have no strong opinion about it, maybe > we can support both convention (with and without @). I suggest supporting just @seconds, this would also match the behaviour of date(1) and the gnulib module it uses: $ date -u -d @1348331662 Sat Sep 22 16:34:22 UTC 2012 -- ldv
