On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 08:19:25PM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > The goal is to try to provide an alternative, make it more stable,
> > and maybe in future use it. The current util-linux meson configuration is
> > probably not mature enough to be used as a build-system for end-users and
> > downstream distributions, but it seems as a nice alternative for
> > developers, it's faster and it produces real binaries rather than
> > libtool scripts.
>
> Eh, I'd say that at this point meson (despite occasional small tweaks
> required) is more stable than autotools.
I have talked about "current util-linux meson configuration", not
about meson itself. We need to test our stuff better, make sure all
the configuration options works as expected, etc.
Karel
--
Karel Zak <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>
http://karelzak.blogspot.com
