Re: [PATCH] blkdiscard: Refuse to proceed if signatures are found

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 11:29:16AM +0200, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> With this commit blkdiscard will check for existing signatures on the
> device and refuse to continue if any are found unless the operation is
> forced with the -f option.

Good idea.

> +/*
> + * Check existing signature on the open fd
> + * Returns	0  if no signature was found
> + * 		1  if a signature was found

this is not true, 0 means detected, 1 not found

> + * 		<0 on error
> + */
> +static int device_empty(int fd, char *path)

This is difficult for to read, at first glance it seems according
to function name that 1 means "yes, it's empty".
      
Maybe rename it to probe_device().

> +{
> +	const char *type;
> +	blkid_probe pr = NULL;
> +	int ret = -1;
> +
> +	pr = blkid_new_probe();
> +	if (!pr || blkid_probe_set_device(pr, fd, 0, 0))
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	blkid_probe_enable_superblocks(pr, TRUE);
> +	blkid_probe_enable_partitions(pr, TRUE);
> +
> +	ret = blkid_do_fullprobe(pr);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;

yes, blkid_do_fullprobe() returns: 0 on success, 1 if nothing is detected or -1 on case of error.

> +
> +	if (!blkid_probe_lookup_value(pr, "TYPE", &type, NULL)) {
> +		warnx("%s contains existing file system (%s).",path ,type);
> +	} else if (!blkid_probe_lookup_value(pr, "PTTYPE", &type, NULL)) {
> +		warnx("%s contains existing partition (%s).",path ,type);
> +	} else {
> +		warnx("%s contains existing signature.", path);
> +	}
> +
> +	blkid_free_probe(pr);
> +	return ret;

This is always 0.

> +}
>  
>  int main(int argc, char **argv)
>  {
>  	char *path;
> -	int c, fd, verbose = 0, secsize, force = 0;
> +	int c, fd, ret, verbose = 0, secsize, force = 0;
>  	uint64_t end, blksize, step, range[2], stats[2];
>  	struct stat sb;
>  	struct timeval now, last;
> @@ -184,7 +219,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>  		errtryhelp(EXIT_FAILURE);
>  	}
>  
> -	fd = open(path, O_WRONLY | (force ? 0 : O_EXCL));
> +	fd = open(path, O_RDWR | (force ? 0 : O_EXCL));
>  	if (fd < 0)
>  		err(EXIT_FAILURE, _("cannot open %s"), path);
>  
> @@ -217,6 +252,21 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>  		errx(EXIT_FAILURE, _("%s: length %" PRIu64 " is not aligned "
>  			 "to sector size %i"), path, range[1], secsize);
>  
> +	 /* Check for existing signatures on the device */
> +	if ((ret = device_empty(fd, path)) == 0) {

 What about:

 switch (probe_device(fd, path)) {
 case 0: /* signature detected */
> +		/*
> +		 * Only require force in interactive mode to avoid
> +		 * breaking existing scripts
> +		 */
> +		if (!force && isatty(STDIN_FILENO)) {
> +			errx(EXIT_FAILURE,
> +			     _("This is destructive operation, data will " \
> +			       "be lost! Use the -f option to override."));
> +		}
> +		warnx(_("Operation forced, data will be lost!"));
        break;

 case 1: /* no signature */
        break;

 default: /* error */
> +		err(EXIT_FAILURE, _("failed to probe the device"));
        break;
 }


I think it's more readable ;-)

    Karel

-- 
 Karel Zak  <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>
 http://karelzak.blogspot.com




[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux