Re: Help with reviewing dosfstools patches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 14.06.19 17:45, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote:
> On 14.06.19 16:20, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote:
> 
> <snip>
> 
> Currently working through your branches. Smells like they really deserve
> a rebase and signed-off lines.

rebased/applied your patches and got test failures:

XFAIL: check-dot_entries
========================

Test check-dot_entries
First fsck run to check and fix error...
fsck.fat 4.1+git (2017-01-24)
/DIR
  "." is not first entry. Can't fix this yet.
/DIR
  ".." is not second entry. Can't fix this yet.
check-dot_entries.img: 4 files, 3/63931 clusters
*** Error was not detected by fsck.
XFAIL check-dot_entries.fsck (exit status: 100)

XFAIL: check-huge
=================

Test check-huge
First fsck run to check and fix error...
Failed to read sector 167772191.
fsck.fat 4.1+git (2017-01-24)
Second fsck run to check if error was fixed...
Failed to read sector 167772191.
fsck.fat 4.1+git (2017-01-24)
*** Error was not fixed by fsck.
XFAIL check-huge.fsck (exit status: 1)


--mtx

-- 
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
Free software and Linux embedded engineering
info@xxxxxxxxx -- +49-151-27565287



[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux