On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 01:51:12PM +0000, Jakowski, Andrzej wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 01:40:08PM +0000, Karel Zak wrote:
> > From my point of view (and maybe I'm wrong ;-)) it seems complex enough to keep it as an independent stand-alone project ("sed-utils").
> > Not sure if it makes sense to push it to generic util-linux package.
>
> It sounds to me that your major concern for inclusion sedcli into util-linux is
> its complexity. What would be the best method to understand if sedcli fits into
> util-linux?
Do you have the current code/repo with sedcli accessible anywhere? It
would be nice to see it.
Karel
--
Karel Zak <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>
http://karelzak.blogspot.com
