On Sunday 06 May 2018 12:35:02 Michael Kerrisk (man-opages) wrote: > On 02/28/2018 11:03 PM, Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Wednesday 28 February 2018 14:32:20 Jan Kara wrote: > > > On Wed 28-02-18 14:08:28, Karel Zak wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:44:07PM -0600, Steve Kenton wrote: > > > > > Signed-off-by: Steve Kenton <skenton@xxxxxx> > > > > > Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> > > > > > --- > > > > > sys-utils/mount.8 | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- > > > > > 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > Applied, thanks. > > > > > > > > Jan, what about to create udf(5) man page? We already have fs-specific > > > > man pages (e.g. ext4, tmpfs, nfs, btrfs, ...). It's usually maintained > > > > within fs-specific tools (e.g. ext4 -> e2fsprogs) or together with > > > > standard man-pages (CC: to Michael). > > > > > > I'm fine with that. Pali is actually the maintainer of udf-tools so if he > > > is willing to take the manpage there, it's probably the best place. > > > > Is udftools the best place for kernel udf mount options? Because > > userspace udftools are not needed for kernel udf driver, nor for > > mounting existing udf filesystem. > > > > For me it looks like that kernel drivers should have its documentation > > in kernel itself... > > [way late to the party...] > > Or, better, in a man page that describes the kernel interface :-). > Many other filesystems have by now Section 5 pages in the man-pages package > that I maintain. A udf(5) page that describes the mount options that the > kernel supports for UDF would be best, and I think best lives inside > "man-pages" because it is kernel interface stuff. Ok, that sounds good. > Or, did such a page already land in udf-tools? No, there is no such manpage. -- Pali Rohár pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
