Re: uuidparse: test fails on 32bit machines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 18 July 2017, Karel Zak wrote:
> I have removed this dates from the test. The things are internally
> based on time_t (=long) and uint32_t. It does not make sense to use
> it for huge numbers.


FYI I have created two travis testing branches in my private github 
repo: https://travis-ci.org/rudimeier/util-linux/builds

  travis-cc-test
     - testing many different compilers versions, even using -Werror
     - gcc 4.6, 4.8, 5, 6 and 7
     - clang 3.4, 3.5, 3.9, 4.0 and 5.0
     - OSX xcode 6.4, 7.3, 8.3

  travis-cc-test
     - testing 32bit build, -m32 -Werror

These build matrices are too big and ugly for our master branch, but 
probably I will keep them in my private repo to run them 
regularly/automated. So now, because of -Werror, we can stop wasting 
time, reviewing again and again our major travis logs for compiler 
warnings, etc.

Regarding -Werror, see the env column of the currently latest build here
https://travis-ci.org/rudimeier/util-linux/builds/254776766

I have added a few -Wno-error=xyz flags for gcc 4.x (false positives). 
And also one for gcc-7 which might be worth to fix.

Note, my both branches above include open pull request #486:
https://github.com/karelzak/util-linux/pull/486

cu,
Rudi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux