Re: [PATCH 3/5] hwclock: final usage() strings slice

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 07/04/2017 03:58 AM, Karel Zak wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 11:35:01AM -0400, J William Piggott wrote:
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> What about the mentioned whitespaces for puts() to get printf
>>> on one line? 
>>>
>>>   puts(  _("     --update-drift   update the RTC drift factor"));
>>>   printf(_("     --noadjfile      do not use %1$s\n"), _PATH_ADJTIME);
>>>   printf(_("     --adjfile <file> use an alternate file to %1$s\n"), _PATH_ADJTIME);
>>>   puts(  _("     --test           dry run; use -D to view what would have happened"));
>>>   puts(  _(" -D, --debug          use debug mode"));
>>
>> Sure, if that is what Karel wants (it can be a separate patch).
>>
>> The only thing that I don't like about that choice is that it can cause
>> puts() lines to wrap that otherwise would not. Since puts() is a lot
>> more common than printf(), it seems like putting the alignment burden on
>> printf() makes more sense.
> 
> I think the idea is to use the extra space only if you mix printf and
> puts in the same code block. We have on many place only puts (or
> fputs) -- in this case the extra space is unnecessary.

True. I meant that in mixed conditions *puts() seems more common. So if
you have a full column of *puts() and one *printf(), forcing the puts
lines to add whitespace could make many of them wrap, thus adding more
ugliness to the source than if the alignment burden is on *printf().

Again, this is an anecdotal comment only, I don't have a strong opinion
about it. For messy usage() blocks I typically toggle nowrap in my
editor; so the alignment choice is not a big deal for me.

If there aren't any other objections you could commit this set; the
alignment change qualifies for a separate commit, I think.


> 
>     Karel
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux